多平台统一管理软件接口，如何实现多平台统一管理软件接口
285
2022-11-25
你所不知道的Spring的@Autowired实现细节分析
你所不知道的Spring的@Autowired实现细节分析
前言
相信很多java开发都遇到过一个面试题：Resource和Autowired的区别是什么？这个问题的答案相信基本都清楚，但是这两者在Spring中是如何实现的呢？这就要分析Springhttp://源码才能知道了。友情提示：本篇主要是讲解Autowired的实现原理，不会分析Spring初始化的过程，不熟悉的读者可以先阅读笔者之前的一篇文章《这一次搞懂Spring的Bean实例化原理》。
正文
在Spring Bean的整个创建过程中会调用很多BeanPostProcessor接口的的实现类：
上图是我整理的Spring Bean的创建过程及整个过程中各个BeanPostProcessor和回调的调用，右边相同颜色的连线代表是同一组调用，主要看到AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor和CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor，前者就是支持 @Autowired和@Value注解，后者则是支持@PostConstruct、@PreDestroy、@Resource注解。先了解这两个Processor的作用，下面从头分析。
从图中可以看到，在createBeanInstance方法中会调用SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor类型的determineCandidateConstructors，这个方法是做什么的呢？看代码：
protected BeanWrapper createBeanInstance(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, @Nullable Object[] args) {
......
// Candidate constructors for autowiring?
//寻找当前正在实例化的bean中有@Autowired注解的构造函数
Constructor>[] ctors = determineConstructorsFromBeanPostProcessors(beanClass, beanName);
if (ctors != null || mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_CONSTRUCTOR ||
mbd.hasConstructorArgumentValues() || !ObjectUtils.isEmpty(args)) {
//如果ctors不为空，就说明构造函数上有@Autowired注解
return autowireConstructor(beanName, mbd, ctors, args);
}
......
// No special handling: simply use no-arg constructor.
return instantiateBean(beanName, mbd);
}
protected Constructor>[] determineConstructorsFromBeanPostProcessors(@Nullable Class> beanClass, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
if (beanClass != null && hasInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessors()) {
for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
if (bp instanceof SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) {
SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp;
Constructor>[] ctors = ibp.determineCandidateConstructors(beanClass, beanName);
if (ctors != null) {
return ctors;
}
}
}
}
return null;
}
createBeanInstance方法是去实例化Bean，而调用AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.determineCandidateConstructors的目的就是先去找到带有@Autowired注解的构造方法（自动注入有三种模式：属性、构造方法、普通方法），也就是通过构造方法注入，如果没有找到则通过反射调用无参构造实例化。平时我们基本上都是使用的属性注入，所以一般都不会进入determineCandidateConstructors方法，所以这里也不详细阐述，感兴趣的读者可自行看看。
接着回到doCreateBean方法中，就可以看到调用了applyMergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessors方法：
protected void applyMergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessors(RootBeanDefinition mbd, Class> beanType, String beanName) {
for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
if (bp instanceof MergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessor) {
/**
* CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor 支持了@PostConstruct，@PreDestroy,@Resource注解
* AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor 支持 @Autowired,@Value注解
*/
MergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessor bdp = (MergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessor) bp;
bdp.postProcessMergedBeanDefinition(mbd, beanType, beanName);
}
}
}
这个方法本质上就是调用MergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessor类型的postProcessMergedBeanDefinition方法，通过这个方法去收集@Autowired、@Resource等注解，这里主要分析AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor的实现：
public void postProcessMergedBeanDefinition(RootBeanDefinition beanDefinition, Class> beanType, String beanName) {
InjectionMetadata metadata = findAutowiringMetadata(beanName, beanType, null);
metadata.checkConfigMembers(beanDefinition);
}
private InjectionMetadata findAutowiringMetadata(String beanName, Class> clazz, @Nullable PropertyValues pvs) {
// Fall back to class name as cache key, for backwards compatibility with custom callers.
String cacheKey = (StringUtils.hasLength(beanName) ? beanName : clazz.getName());
// Quick check on the concurrent map first, with minimal locking.
InjectionMetadata metadata = this.injectionMetadataCache.get(cacheKey);
if (InjectionMetadata.needsRefresh(metadata, clazz)) {
synchronized (this.injectionMetadataCache) {
metadata = this.injectionMetadataCache.get(cacheKey);
if (InjectionMetadata.needsRefresh(metadata, clazz)) {
if (metadata != null) {
metadata.clear(pvs);
}
//主要看这个方法
metadata = buildAutowiringMetadata(clazz);
this.injectionMetadataCache.put(cacheKey, metadata);
}
}
}
return metadata;
}
private InjectionMetadata buildAutowiringMetadata(final Class> clazz) {
List
Class> targetCliChIKilpOrass = clazz;
do {
final List
// 找到带有@Autowired注解的属性并封装为AnnotationAttributes
ReflectionUtils.doWithLocalFields(targetClass, field -> {
AnnotationAttributes ann = findAutowiredAnnotation(field);
if (ann != null) {
if (Modifier.isStatic(field.getModifiers())) {
if (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
logger.info("Autowired annotation is not supported on static fields: " + field);
}
return;
}
boolean required = determineRequiredStatus(ann);
currElements.add(new AutowiredFieldElement(field, required));
}
});
// 找到带有@Autowired注解的方法并封装为AnnotationAttributes
ReflectionUtils.doWithLocalMethods(targetClass, method -> {
Method bridgedMethod = BridgeMethodResolver.findBridgedMethod(method);
if (!BridgeMethodResolver.isVisibilityBridgeMethodPair(method, bridgedMethod)) {
return;
}
AnnotationAttributes ann = findAutowiredAnnotation(bridgedMethod);
if (ann != null && method.equals(ClassUtils.getMostSpecificMethod(method, clazz))) {
if (Modifier.isStatic(method.getModifiers())) {
ifiChIKilpOr (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
logger.info("Autowired annotation is not supported on static methods: " + method);
}
return;
}
if (method.getParameterCount() == 0) {
if (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
logger.info("Autowired annotation should only be used on methods with parameters: " +
method);
}
}
boolean required = determineRequiredStatus(ann);
PropertyDescriptor pd = BeanUtils.findPropertyForMethod(bridgedMethod, clazz);
currElements.add(new AutowiredMethodElement(method, required, pd));
}
});
elements.addAll(0, currElements);
targetClass = targetClass.getSuperclass();
}
while (targetClass != null && targetClass != Object.class);
return new InjectionMetadata(clazz, elements);
}
收集的逻辑主要在findAutowiringMetadata方法中，层层调用后可以看到是通过findAutowiredAnnotation这个方法去找到带有@Autowired和@Value注解的属性和方法：
private final Set
public AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor() {
this.autowiredAnnotationTypes.add(Autowired.class);
this.autowiredAnnotationTypes.add(Value.class);
try {
this.autowiredAnnotationTypes.add((Class extends Annotation>)
ClassUtils.forName("javax.inject.Inject", AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.class.getClassLoader()));
logger.trace("jsR-330 'javax.inject.Inject' annotation found and supported for autowiring");
}
catch (ClassNotFoundException ex) {
// JSR-330 API not available - simply skip.
}
}
private AnnotationAttributes findAutowiredAnnotation(AccessibleObject ao) {
if (ao.getAnnotations().length > 0) { // autowiring annotations have to be local
for (Class extends Annotation> type : this.autowiredAnnotationTypes) {
AnnotationAttributes attributes = AnnotatedElementUtils.getMergedAnnotationAttributes(ao, type);
if (attributes != null) {
return attributes;
}
}
}
return null;
}
最后将其封装为AutowiredFieldElement和AutowiredMethodElement对象的list并连同Class一起封装成InjectionMetadata返回，这就完成了相关注解的收集。
收集完成后在哪里使用呢？对Bean生命周期熟悉的读者都知道，之后就会进行依赖注入，自然相关的调用就在populateBean这个方法里：
protected void populateBean(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, @Nullable BeanWrapper bw) {
......
PropertyValues pvs = (mbd.hasPropertyValues() ? mbd.getPropertyValues() : null);
if (mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_BY_NAME || mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_BY_TYPE) {
MutablePropertyValues newPvs = new MutablePropertyValues(pvs);
// Add property values based on autowire by name if applicable.
if (mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_BY_NAME) {
autowireByName(beanName, mbd, bw, newPvs);
}
// Add property values based on autowire by type if applicable.
if (mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_BY_TYPE) {
autowireByType(beanName, mbd, bw, newPvs);
}
pvs = newPvs;
}
boolean hasInstAwareBpps = hasInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessors();
boolean needsDepCheck = (mbd.getDependencyCheck() != AbstractBeanDefinition.DEPENDENCY_CHECK_NONE);
PropertyDescriptor[] filteredPds = null;
//重点看这个if代码块，重要程度 5
if (hasInstAwareBpps) {
if (pvs == null) {
pvs = mbd.getPropertyValues()iChIKilpOr;
}
for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
if (bp instanceof InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) {
InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp;
// 依赖注入过程，@Autowired的支持
PropertyValues pvsToUse = ibp.postProcessProperties(pvs, bw.getWrappedInstance(), beanName);
if (pvsToUse == null) {
if (filteredPds == null) {
filteredPds = filterPropertyDescriptorsForDependencyCheck(bw, mbd.allowCaching);
}
// 老版本用这个完成依赖注入过程，@Autowired的支持
pvsToUse = ibp.postProcessPropertyValues(pvs, filteredPds, bw.getWrappedInstance(), beanName);
if (pvsToUse == null) {
return;
}
}
pvs = pvsToUse;
}
}
}
if (needsDepCheck) {
if (filteredPds == null) {
filteredPds = filterPropertyDescriptorsForDependencyCheck(bw, mbd.allowCaching);
}
checkDependencies(beanName, mbd, filteredPds, pvs);
}
// xml中
if (pvs != null) {
applyPropertyValues(beanName, mbd, bw, pvs);
}
}
mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_BY_NAME || mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_BY_TYPE
很多读者包括网上很多文章在看到这个判断时，都认为自动注入的逻辑就是这里，但实际上并不是，这里是自动注入没错，但却是针对以前xml配置，如下：
xmlns:xsi="http://w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://springframework.org/schema/beans http://springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd" default-autowire="byName">
xmlns:xsi="http://w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://springframework.org/schema/beans
http://springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd"
default-autowire="byName">
头文件中的default-autowire属性就是开启全局自动注入，而bean标签上的autowire则是特定针对当前bean的，会覆盖全局配置。这样我们配置后，bean标签就无需配置prototype子标签，也能自动注入对应的对象。这些属性包含了以下几个值：
no：默认值。表示不进行自动注入。对应BeanDefinition中autowireMode的值为 0。
byName：根据名称进行自动注入。对应BeanDefinition中autowireMode的值为1。
byType：根据类型进行自动注入，如果容器中找到两个及以上符合该类型的Bean就将抛出异常。对应BeanDefinition中autowireMode的值为2。
constructor：等同于byType，只是当指定autowire=”constructor”时表示将通过构造方法根据类型进行自动注入。对应BeanDefinition中autowireMode的值为3。
这就是xml配置中的自动注入，而我们使用@Autowired注解时，BeanDefinition中autowireMode的值为 0，即表示不进行自动注入。插一句题外话，网上很多人在争论@Autowired是自动注入还是手动注入，我个人认为都算自动注入，不能说它没有进入这段逻辑就不能叫自动注入，只是它以另外一种方式实现了，至少也没有让我们自己手动new并设置属性。
那这另外一种方式是什么呢？就是下面这个代码干的事：
if (hasInstAwareBpps) {
if (pvs == null) {
pvs = mbd.getPropertyValues();
}
for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
if (bp instanceof InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) {
InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp;
// 依赖注入过程，@Autowired的支持
PropertyValues pvsToUse = ibp.postProcessProperties(pvs, bw.getWrappedInstance(), beanName);
if (pvsToUse == null) {
if (filteredPds == null) {
filteredPds = filterPropertyDescriptorsForDependencyCheck(bw, mbd.allowCaching);
}
// 老版本用这个完成依赖注入过程，@Autowired的支持
pvsToUse = ibp.postProcessPropertyValues(pvs, filteredPds, bw.getWrappedInstance(), beanName);
if (pvsToUse == null) {
return;
}
}
pvs = pvsToUse;
}
}
}
可以看到这里又是调用了InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor类型的postProcessProperties和postProcessPropertyValues方法，后者是老版本中的实现，已经废弃，所以直接看postProcessProperties，还是进入到AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor类中：
public PropertyValues postProcessProperties(PropertyValues pvs, Object bean, String beanName) {
InjectionMetadata metadata = findAutowiringMetadata(beanName, bean.getClass(), pvs);
try {
metadata.inject(bean, beanName, pvs);
}
catch (BeanCreationException ex) {
throw ex;
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
throw new BeanCreationException(beanName, "Injection of autowired dependencies failed", ex);
}
return pvs;
}
findAutowiringMetadata这个方法不陌生的，刚刚已经分析了，是去收集对应注解并封装为InjectionMetadata对象放入到缓存，这里就是从缓存中拿到值，注入则是通过inject实现的：
public void inject(Object target, @Nullable String beanName, @Nullable PropertyValues pvs) throws Throwable {
Collection
Collection
(checkedElements != null ? checkedElements : this.injectedElements);
if (!elementsToIterate.isEmpty()) {
for (InjectedElement element : elementsToIterate) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Processing injected element of bean '" + beanName + "': " + element);
}
if(element.isField) {
Field field = (Field)element.member;
System.out.println("==IOC/DI===beanName==" + beanName + "==field[" + field.getName() +"]-> getBean(" + field.getName() + ")");
}
element.inject(target, beanName, pvs);
}
}
}
最后就是调用element.inject实现注入，element我们刚刚也看到了，就是AutowiredFieldElement和AutowiredMethodElement，分别实现属性注入和方法注入，这里我们看最常用的属性注入就行了：
protected void inject(Object bean, @Nullable String beanName, @Nullable PropertyValues pvs) throws Throwable {
Field field = (Field) this.member;
Object value;
if (this.cached) {
value = resolvedCachedArgument(beanName, this.cachedFieldValue);
}
else {
DependencyDescriptor desc = new DependencyDescriptor(field, this.required);
desc.setContainingClass(bean.getClass());
Set
Assert.state(beanFactory != null, "No BeanFactory available");
TypeConverter typeConverter = beanFactory.getTypeConverter();
try {
// 找到依赖对象
value = beanFactory.resolveDependency(desc, beanName, autowiredBeanNames, typeConverter);
}
catch (BeansException ex) {
throw new UnsatisfiedDependencyException(null, beanName, new InjectionPoint(field), ex);
}
synchronized (this) {
if (!this.cached) {
if (value != null || this.required) {
this.cachedFieldValue = desc;
registerDependentBeans(beanName, autowiredBeanNames);
if (autowiredBeanNames.size() == 1) {
String autowiredBeanName = autowiredBeanNames.iterator().next();
if (beanFactory.containsBean(autowiredBeanName) &&
beanFactory.isTypeMatch(autowiredBeanName, field.getType())) {
this.cachedFieldValue = new ShortcutDependencyDescriptor(
desc, autowiredBeanName, field.getType());
}
}
}
else {
this.cachedFieldValue = null;
}
this.cached = true;
}
}
}
if (value != null) {
ReflectionUtils.makeAccessible(field);
field.set(bean, value);
}
}
这段代码整体逻辑比较清晰，首先根据field创建一个依赖对象的抽象DependencyDescriptor对象，然后通过beanFactory.resolveDependency解析拿到对应的实例，最后通过反射注入即可。
因此我们主要看resolveDependency方法中做了什么：
public Object resolveDependency(DependencyDescriptor descriptor, @Nullable String requestingBeanName,
@Nullable Set
descriptor.initParameterNameDiscovery(getParameterNameDiscoverer());
if (Optional.class == descriptor.getDependencyType()) {
return createOptionalDependency(descriptor, requestingBeanName);
}
else if (ObjectFactory.class == descriptor.getDependencyType() ||
ObjectProvider.class == descriptor.getDependencyType()) {
return new DependencyObjectProvider(descriptor, requestingBeanName);
}
else if (javaxInjectProviderClass == descriptor.getDependencyType()) {
return new Jsr330Factory().createDependencyProvider(descriptor, requestingBeanName);
}
else {
Object result = getAutowireCandidateResolver().getLazyResolutionProxyIfNecessary(
descriptor, requestingBeanName);
if (result == null) {
result = doResolveDependency(descriptor, requestingBeanName, autowiredBeanNames, typeConverter);
}
return result;
}
}
一般情况下，都是走的else分支并调用doResolveDependency方法：
public Object doResolveDependency(DependencyDescriptor descriptor, @Nullable String beanName,
@Nullable Set
InjectionPoint previousInjectionPoint = ConstructorResolver.setCurrentInjectionPoint(descriptor);
try {
Object shortcut = descriptor.resolveShortcut(this);
if (shortcut != null) {
return shortcut;
}
Class> type = descriptor.getDependencyType();
Object value = getAutowireCandidateResolver().getSuggestedValue(descriptor);
if (value != null) {
if (value instanceof String) {
String strVal = resolveEmbeddedValue((String) value);
BeanDefinition bd = (beanName != null && containsBean(beanName) ? getMergedBeanDefinition(beanName) : null);
value = evaluateBeanDefinitionString(strVal, bd);
}
TypeConverter converter = (typeConverter != null ? typeConverter : getTypeConverter());
return (descriptor.getField() != null ?
converter.convertIfNecessary(value, type, descriptor.getField()) :
converter.convertIfNecessary(value, type, descriptor.getMethodParameter()));
}
// 有多个实现类需要注入，特指注入的是数组、集合或者Map
Object multipleBeans = resolveMultipleBeans(descriptor, beanName, autowiredBeanNames, typeConverter);
if (multipleBeans != null) {
return multipleBeans;
}
// 找到依赖对象的所有实现类
Map
if (matchingBeans.isEmpty()) {
if (isRequired(descriptor)) {
raiseNoMatchingBeanFound(type, descriptor.getResolvableType(), descriptor);
}
return null;
}
String autowiredBeanName;
Object instanceCandidate;
// 依赖的对象有多个实例
if (matchingBeans.size() > 1) {
// 根据@Primary、@Priority和名称依次进行匹配注入
autowiredBeanName = determineAutowireCandidate(matchingBeans, descriptor);
if (autowiredBeanName == null) {
if (isRequired(descriptor) || !indicatesMultipleBeans(type)) {
return descriptor.resolveNotUnique(descriptor.getResolvableType(), matchingBeans);
}
else {
// In case of an optional Collection/Map, silently ignore a non-unique case:
// possibly it was meant to be an empty collection of multiple regular beans
// (before 4.3 in particular when we didn't even look for collection beans).
return null;
}
}
instanceCandidate = matchingBeans.get(autowiredBeanName);
}
else {
// We have exactly one match.
Map.Entry
autowiredBeanName = entry.getKey();
instanceCandidate = entry.getValue();
}
if (autowiredBeanNames != null) {
autowiredBeanNames.add(autowiredBeanName);
}
// 如果拿到的是class对象，通过getBean实例化返回
if (instanceCandidate instanceof Class) {
instanceCandidate = descriptor.resolveCandidate(autowiredBeanName, type, this);
}
Object result = instanceCandidate;
if (result instanceof NullBean) {
if (isRequired(descriptor)) {
raiseNoMatchingBeanFound(type, descriptor.getResolvableType(), descriptor);
}
result = null;
}
if (!ClassUtils.isAssignableValue(type, result)) {
throw new BeanNotOfRequiredTypeException(autowiredBeanName, type, instanceCandidate.getClass());
}
return result;
}
finally {
ConstructorResolver.setCurrentInjectionPoint(previousInjectionPoint);
}
}
这里面首先是通过 getAutowireCandidateResolver().getSuggestedValue(descriptor)拿到@Value注解的值，然后通过TypeConverter进行转换，默认可转换的类型是JDK和Spring内置的一些类型，自然不包含我们自定义的类，所以如果不进行扩展在@Autowired注入我们自定义类对象时同时使用@Value注解是会报错的。
接着是调用resolveMultipleBeans方法实现对Map、List、数组等属性的注入，本质上还是调用findAutowireCandidates方法找到所有的实现类的对象装入对应的集合数组中，所以直接看findAutowireCandidates：
protected Map
@Nullable String beanName, Class> requiredType, DependencyDescriptor descriptor) {
String[] candidateNames = BeanFactoryUtils.beanNamesForTypeIncludingAncestors(
this, requiredType, true, descriptor.isEager());
Map
......
for (String candidate : candidateNames) {
if (!isSelfReference(beanName, candidate) && isAutowireCandidate(candidate, descriptor)) {
addCandidateEntry(result, candidate, descriptor, requiredType);
}
}
......
return result;
}
private void addCandidateEntry(Map
DependencyDescriptor descriptor, Class> requiredType) {
if (descriptor instanceof MultiElementDescriptor) {
Object beanInstance = descriptor.resolveCandidate(candidateName, requiredType, this);
if (!(beanInstance instanceof NullBean)) {
candidates.put(candidateName, beanInstance);
}
}
else if (containsSingleton(candidateName) || (descriptor instanceof StreamDependencyDescriptor &&
((StreamDependencyDescriptor) descriptor).isOrdered())) {
Object beanInstance = descriptor.resolveCandidate(candidateName, requiredType, this);
candidates.put(candidateName, (beanInstance instanceof NullBean ? null : beanInstance));
}
else {
candidates.put(candidateName, getType(candidateName));
}
}
首先通过beanNamesForTypeIncludingAncestors方法拿到依赖类所有的实现类的beanName，然后调用addCandidateEntry将beanName及对应的实例或者Class对象放入到Map中。
接着回到doResolveDependency方法中：
if (matchingBeans.size() > 1) {
// 根据@Primary、@Priority和名称依次进行匹配注入
autowiredBeanName = determineAutowireCandidate(matchingBeans, descriptor);
if (autowiredBeanName == null) {
if (isRequired(descriptor) || !indicatesMultipleBeans(type)) {
return descriptor.resolveNotUnique(descriptor.getResolvableType(), matchingBeans);
}
else {
// In case of an optional Collection/Map, silently ignore a non-unique case:
// possibly it was meant to be an empty collection of multiple regular beans
// (before 4.3 in particular when we didn't even look for collection beans).
return null;
}
}
instanceCandidate = matchingBeans.get(autowiredBeanName);
}
else {
// We have exactly one match.
Map.Entry
autowiredBeanName = entry.getKey();
instanceCandidate = entry.getValue();
}
if (autowiredBeanNames != null) {
autowiredBeanNames.add(autowiredBeanName);
}
// 如果拿到的是class对象，通过getBean实例化返回
if (instanceCandidate instanceof Class) {
instanceCandidate = descriptor.resolveCandidate(autowiredBeanName, type, this);
}
Object result = instanceCandidate;
如果只有一个实例则直接返回该实例，如果实现类有多个则调用determineAutowireCandidate进行判断该使用哪一个实例对象，判断规则如下：
首先判断实现类上是否有@Primary注解，找到一个则返回当前实例，找到多个则报错。
若没有标注@Primary注解，则判断是否指定了优先级，且只能是通过@Priority注解指定的，@Order不支持。
上述都没有拿到合适的Bean则通过属性名称获取Bean。
拿到对应的实例后，最后进行反射注入即可。以上就是@Autowired的实现细节。
总结
本篇从源码角度详细分析了@Autowired的实现细节，只有真正阅读了源码才能了解更多的细节，在开发中更加清楚如何注入多个实例以及如何指定注入的优先级，同时在面试中也能更有理有据，而不是统一的大众回答，先根据byType，再根据byName。另外对于方法注入和@Resource注解的处理本篇没有涉及，但是相信看完本文读者自己也能轻松分析这部分源码。
版权声明：本文内容由网络用户投稿，版权归原作者所有，本站不拥有其著作权，亦不承担相应法律责任。如果您发现本站中有涉嫌抄袭或描述失实的内容，请联系我们jiasou666@gmail.com 处理，核实后本网站将在24小时内删除侵权内容。
相关文章
发表评论
暂时没有评论，来抢沙发吧~